America is the country where Facebook, Google and Amazon will cite “free speech” when questioned about marketing violent child-porn to tedious old catladies, and where those same companies will also cite “free expression” to silence anyone who disagrees with their own agenda.
Tulsi Gabbard is a democratic candidate for president. Right after she kicked the shit out of the establishment toadies, Google decided to unperson her. She did the right thing and immediately filed a lawsuit.
She’s also raising awareness of these criminal scum on the campaign trail.
Imagine if we had a president who said something like this.
And on the other side of the aisle, Laura Loomer is running for congress in Florida.
Laura Loomer is certainly a goon, and I don’t agree with everything she’s ever espoused, but she is doing very important work lately, which protects each of us.
It’s also humorous to note that Loomer is described as a dangerous terrorist, by the same facebook admins who profit off the sales of a sick old feminist’s rape fantasies.
Without making too much of an issue of it, I have donated to each to these campaigns, and plan on donating in the future (not exceeding the federal limits). This is a way for me to put some “skin in the game” while expressing my appreciation for the people who fight in my interests.
Google unpersoned her….well that at least signifies to me she’s probably one of the more based democrat candidates in a while.
Tulsi is pro 1A, pro 2A, a patriotic vet who knows the cost of war, and won’t send your kids off to die in some foreign shithole. She’s also promised to break up the tech monopoly. In short, she’s everything Donald Trump promised and didn’t deliver.
I think Fuckbook/Twatter/Cuckazon had it in their head that their girl Kamala was going to swoop in and let them continue to tell us all what’s what. Kamala’s a fuck’n Canadian, which means she’d be an absolute disaster as president. Her chances to do anything outside of California were scuttled by Tulsi in about one minute. It was hilarious to watch.
Laura Loomer is sort of a loon, but she did a wonderful job going undercover to expose baby murder and corporate mind control. A year after our enemies tried to silence her, she is still out in the streets, mocking and tormenting them. Whatever other weird ideas she might have, she’s clearly ourgrrrrl in all the ways that matter.
I keep hearing in conservative circles “Trump has done so much for this country” and I will agree, he is probably better than the other choice we did have in 2016……..and yet
*Arms deal with Saudi Arabia…who is not our “friend” and never has been (that 1973 oil embargo that the country never really recovered from….all the Sept 11th hijackers…..a very backhanded way of moving arms, money and destabilization in that region……and double crossing us on countless other policies over the decades)
*That “wall” Mexico is going to pay for. No, we’re paying for it…and very little has been built, and if you call a fence a “wall” you’re really stupid.
*Illegal immigration hasn’t slowed or stopped…..agencies are not reporting it now. It’s like Turkey, homelessness is “illegal” there, so they don’t have a homeless problem. Go to Turkey, and the homeless are all over the street.
*Deportations. Who? The federal prisons are filled with illegal immigrants. No one has been “sent home”
*Spending has not been cut, it is still increasing. That “spending bill” increased spending we don’t have
*Companies have not and are not moving their businesses back home, creating all these “manufacturing jobs”
*He’s been wavering and caving on some aspects of the 2nd Amendment
*He uses Twitter like a teenager and behaves like one in these matters. It’s not presidential or mature….yet his psychophant followers view these statements as “bold” and “changing america” it’s doing nothing, and just makes him look stupid.
*Every regulation he tries to overturn will be thrown into the courts, try using congress…like the constitution says you’re supposed to do. Argue your points and convince people. This executive order thing is dictator behavior, and its been abused since the 1980’s. Doing that would take work, real debate and work by the congress. Don’t get your hopes up.
*It’s one thing to claim all these things, but even his Sec of Education has done little or nothing to change the agency direction….and they are still moving towards “student loan forgiveness”
He’s very concerned with polls. Most of our greatest presidents never minded about them, or if they did it was a passing glance.
Tulsi is a great example of how the old party binary doesn’t quite fit anymore, similar to how all the establishment Republicans publicly hated Trump at the beginning. Neither of them fit perfectly into the previous mold, and so both of them are dangerous because people might want to change how the “sides” are defined, even before their individual policy stances are taken into account.
Trump simply had more social credit and personal finances to burn to prevent being shut out.
For some fun physiognomy, check the jawline and chin for Gabbard and Loomer. Guess what testosterone exposure does to the jaw? Some behaviors are conditioned, and some have a more natural explanation for an apparent predisposition.
If Tulsi had raised some children, she’d likely have been more of a slam-dunk. Too many leaders without any practice in their own homes, dealing with selfish monsters who refuse to listen and obey. Merkel, for example, doesn’t have any children, and Germany is suffering because of it.
Physiognomy is useless. Using genetics you got from your mother and father to determine on a physical level “who you are” how you will behave all the time and what you will be and are sounds and is borderline eugenical. So much for content of character…..it doesn’t matter…….you look this way, and have this jawline and upswept ears….you’re a monster!!!! You’re a saint. You would be good for this work or that work…….no, you can’t do that because you look like this or that. And it drives physical looks of a person harder than anything else, something the person cannot help or change…..so why have morality, rules, laws, morays, and taboos….your physiognomy determines everything. It’s a dangerous trap. It’s predetermination, and if this is really true…then we don’t need any religion because people cannot help who they are on any level
Trump has children, and Obama has children…didn’t see any behaviors by them that particularly benefits their progenies’ future in this country.
Do you understand the difference between a predetermination and a predisposition?
I do. The question is…do you? For too long men like myself have been lectured by psuedo-science and fads, and plain crazy ideas accepted as truth…..could we apply this psuedo-science to you, expose your flaws, and “predeterminations” and other behaviors you are predispositioned to and towards?
Every man that applies this eugenic science always seems to be exempt, or has some other factor and trait that doesn’t apply to them…or how this said trait stamps out the bad one…but others? No, no, no……your looks now determine what and who you will be. Your jawline and the size of your head determines if you would be a great parent, good at one skill, but bad at another. In the same breath I am told about all these techniques that help you overcome something or anything but yet we are told genetics cannot be overcome…..
“let me measure your nose….nope…too wide / slender…..our children would be stupid and not popular…can’t date you”
Then add to this mess the nurture v nature discussion and it blows into another realm. Excuses made for one trait, but heavily penalized for another.
Depends on who is using this technique. When these purporters of this bs put their pictures up and have a “scientist” in these matters rip them apart for things they could not control, and have all their negative physical traits gone over publicaly, and accepted as truth……….
Guaranteed that suddenly “it won’t be some exact science”
Chronoblip asks:
Jason does, and so do I, which is irrelevant to backing up your implicit claim that phrenology is objectively valuable, at least in some sort of predictive sense.
If you have a peer-reviewed journal article, now would be the time to post it.
lastmod answers:
I really couldn’t have said it better.
lastmod, are you saying that at a glance, you cannot judge a book by its cover?
Paraphrased, Jesus told humanity that the eyes are the windows to the soul (Ma 6:22). As a Christian, I surely do take stock in evaluating people at a glance. Posture, facial features all weigh in. Now, to what ends do I judge a book by its cover? I don’t write someone else off entirely based on their physiology. But you’d better believe if a dude looks creepy, or some woman has all the traits of a skank ho wimminz, I’m not letting my nephew within a 50yd radius of the person.
Keep on working, great job!