Asking Some Unauthorized Questions

Big corporations are sending David Duke for your free speech rights.

One of the reasons that I am not a good candidate for membership in any religious organization, is my tendency to ask unauthorized questions. For example: If God is all powerful, and God is perfectly good, then why doesn’t God kill the devil, and end the whole ‘evil’ problem once and for all? Is god not powerful enough to kill the devil? If so, then It seems that we ought to be praying to this devil character, and following his orders, since it’s him who is really in charge. If God is powerful enough to control things, but has put the devil in charge, of his own sovereign will, then God seems too evil to deserve worship, and we ought to be praying to no one at all…

Of course I ask other questions too. For example, I can name a great number of characters who, like ya boy Boxer, have been banned from Twitter. Off the top of my head, I’ve got:

• Milo Yiannopolous
• Gavin McInnes
• Weev
• Andrew Anglin
• Laura Loomer
• Sam Hyde
• Chuck Johnson
• Pax Dickinson

I should point out that while I’m a member of the set of all those miscreants with lifetime bans from twitter, I don’t really agree with any of these other people.

In order to justify the censorship of these people, all of them have been labeled as neo-Nazis. This despite the fact that Weev and Laura Loomer are descended from holocaust survivors. Milo is a flaming homosexual who brags about having gay sex with black dudes. I believe Gavin and Chuck are both married to Asian chicks. Never mind the truth, though. It’s more important to excuse the bad behavior of Jack Dorsey than to make any salient points. I was banned for making fun of wimminz and promoting #nohymennodiamond – but if I had a big fan club, I’m sure twitter execs would spread the meme that I was an admirer of Uncle Adolf too.

Even if one or more of these people were neo-Nazis, would that be justification to silence them? The answer, of course, is ‘no.’ Being a revisionist goon is not illegal, and one is free to express whackjob beliefs in public. The people on this list who claim to be neo-Nazis seem to do so ironically, probably in an attempt to goad an intolerant society into ever higher levels of self-justification. The closest thing to a “crime” that any of these people commit on the regular is Weev, sending unsolicited messages to unlocked printers. Given that this wouldn’t be possible if the network security people responsible practiced their trade with a minimal level of competence, it’s hard to care that he does this.

So, the above outlined scenario begs a serious unauthorized question that no one seems willing to answer, namely: Why are these people silenced on social media for being neo-Nazis, when they aren’t neo-Nazis, and while people who actually are neo-Nazis have free reign to sqawk and jabber with impunity?

This is a book that is occasionally promoted on the author’s Twitter feed. While Jack Dorsey had a huge problem with me telling young men not to marry banged-out sluts, Dorsey welcomes David Duke with open arms. Moreover, while Dorsey will manufacture fake claims that Laura Loomer is some sort of Jew hating neo-Nazi, Dorsey makes it clear that he actually has no problem with people who actually hold such views.

Given that David Duke, a man who boasts about being a member of the Ku Klux Klan, is welcome on Twitter, what is Jack Dorsey actually doing?

What Jack Dorsey is actually doing is censoring people who are effective.

When Laura Loomer talks about how some school shooting was a Hollywood production, she’s being a goon; however, she also occasionally works with James O’Keefe, going undercover to reveal the bad behavior of executives of big tech firms (like Twitter).

While Laura Loomer has never spread anything like antisemitism, she is objectively dangerous to the capitalist hegemony in our society, and for that, she must be silenced.

David Duke, who is a very committed antisemite, never actually threatens the structure of capital itself. I got curious about what he actually does do, a few weeks ago. Here’s what I found out about David Duke, with a bit of casual web searching.

David Duke claims to have a Ph.D. in history, and he (pretentiously as all Hell) insists upon the adoption of ‘Doctor’ as his first name. One unauthorized question this begs concerns the lack of any recorded thesis in ProQuest. Dr. David Duke Ph.D. has never been cited by any reputable historians on any topic. Where has he taught? Who chaired his committee? Has he ever published anything? If there are answers to these unauthorized questions, I haven’t been able to find them.

While Laura Loomer and Pax Dickinson have never been convicted of anything, David Duke has a long criminal history. What did he do?

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — David Duke, the former Ku Klux Klan leader and politician who spent the past three years overseas preaching “white survival,” pleaded guilty Wednesday to bilking his supporters and cheating on his taxes.

 

Duke, 52, could get up to 15 months in prison and $10,000 in fines under a plea bargain reached with federal prosecutors. He is free on bail until his sentencing March 19.

Given that he entered a guilty plea, it is reasonable to believe that Duke is a very dishonest man.

Duke was accused of telling supporters he was in dire financial straits, then misusing the money they sent him from 1993 to 1999. He was also accused of filing a false 1998 tax return claiming he made only $18,831 in 1998 when he really made more than $65,000.

Imagine my surprise. Duke was wandering around pretending to be living in poverty, begging for cutter from all his gullible supporters, while hiding his actual income and living large on the backs of better men.

What did he do with all the stolen money?

Duke used the money for personal investments and gambling trips to the Mississippi Gulf Coast, Las Vegas and the Bahamas, U.S. Attorney Jim Letten said. Letten would not disclose the amount but said it was “in the six-figure area.”

As an acclaimed historian, I believe that Dr. David Duke Ph.D. would agree that the title of his recent work, The Jew as World Parasite is humorous with a bit of historical context. Who is the grifting parasite, again? Who is it? Say it with me.

Now you boys have already heard me tell you not to give any of these people any of your money, so I’ll spare you any further repetition. That aside, compare David Duke to Laura Loomer, or Sam Hyde, neither of whom have never been sentenced to prison for fraud and tax evasion, and the difference becomes stark.

The fact that I have been banned from Twitter, and David Duke is welcome to babble there, begs a further unauthorized question. 

Who else has not been silenced?

Why have they not been silenced?

Milo Yiannopolous has been silenced, but Richard Spencer has not been silenced.

Heartiste has been silenced, but Dalrock has not been silenced.