Good Morning, Gentlemen. I’ll be reviewing your qualifications today.

Amazon worked on building an artificial-intelligence tool to help with hiring, but the plans backfired when the company discovered the system discriminated against women, Reuters reports.

 

Citing five sources, Reuters said Amazon set up an engineering team in Edinburgh, Scotland, in 2014 to find a way to automate its recruitment.

 

The company created 500 computer models to trawl through past candidates’ résumés and pick up on about 50,000 key terms. The system would crawl the web to recommend candidates.

 

“They literally wanted it to be an engine where I’m going to give you 100 résumés, it will spit out the top five, and we’ll hire those,” one source told Reuters.

That anyone expected anything different would be news. A.I. judges on merit, not on sex-organs. All the female whining in the world won’t sway the cold analysis of the machine.

Consequently, the AI concluded that men were preferable. It reportedly downgraded résumés containing the words “women’s” and filtered out candidates who had attended two women-only colleges.

 

Amazon’s engineers apparently tweaked the system to remedy these particular forms of bias but couldn’t be sure the AI wouldn’t find new ways to unfairly discriminate against candidates.

Career wimminz are obsolete. The sooner we face this reality, the better off we’re all going to be.

Read more at: Business Insider

While our feminist enemies usually present a cool front in their corporate media, they occasionally slip up, unconcealing their actual motivations. So they did in this hysterical New Yorker article. Let’s go through an excerpt of it, and see what wisdom we can glean.

Conflating Donald Trump, our much maligned president, with a Chicago murderer, and subtly pinning the misconstrual on Kanye… Such clever-and-meaningless rhetoric is par for the course.

Granted, we’re not quite at the good part yet, but I had to quote this paragraph, if only to demonstrate the endless feminist hatred for Freud.

Personally, I love Freud, partly because quoting him drives my enemies absolutely bonkers (be they the cartoonish antisemites on the Dalrock comment section, or the kooky feminist academics who hate him without understanding him).

Mostly, I love him because he was the only ardent advocate of patriarchy to come out of the decadence of the 20th century. He believed in fatherhood and intact families, and he stuck to those guns until the end.

The idiots at the New Yorker allude to Kanye being obviously nuts, simply for quoting him. You might think this was a passing indictment. In fact, the author is setting up her main argument. We’ll see it presently.

Here we have it, gentlemen. Kanye is insufficiently ashamed of being a man. Moreover, he’s meeting with a president who suffers from precisely the same pseudopathology.

Let’s go through the list of Kanye’s thoughtcrime, shall we?

1. Kanye thought Bill Cosby should be considered innocent until proven guilty.
2. Kanye got up on SNL wearing a red MAGA hat.
3. Kanye alluded to having read the Moynihan report.
4. Kanye has a history of refusing to worship skanky white sluts, as though they were goddesses.

As to the first count, well, Kanye is proving nothing more than the fact that he paid attention in civics class.

As to count two, Kanye liking an establishment politician, there’s something called the first amendment.

As to count three, everyone in this post code is guilty of that crime as well.

As to count four, that’s been a feature of this blog since the very first post.

At this point, I suspect Kanye might be an undocumented resident of V5K 2C2, himself. Even if he’s not, the third-rate hack who wrote this hit job will find little in the way of sympathy in these parts.

What our enemies hate most is a the sight of two successful, intelligent men, from very different backgrounds, coming together to express concerns for the family life in our society. These men were unchaperoned, and did not spout feminist talking points about giving more money to skank single mothers, or increasing the penalties on so-called “deadbeat dads.”

Kanye West and Donald Trump are insufficiently ashamed of their manhood. That’s the bottom line.

There is more to this article, but I don’t wanna bore you. As I’m anti-plagiarism, and all, I do want to make sure that I give proper credit to the wordsmith who penned this fantastically bright, lucid, helpful article.

The New Yorker magazine is now scraping the barrel’s bottom, recruiting staff out of MTV News. How fitting that the authoress is at least one standard-deviation beneath the people upon whom she heaps scorn and derision. Clownworld in a picture.

One thing we can learn from this nonsense, is just how shortsighted our enemies are. If you have someone who disagrees with you, is it more effective to argue your points, or will it work better if you simply libel that man as being a mentally ill pervert? Kanye does not strike me as a coward. He’s merely hardening his position in response to earlier attacks. More of the same won’t break him.

Good job, libs. Keep winning those hearts and minds.

Edit: Thanks to Earl for breaking this story for us to enjoy.

The filthy trick ho’ above is one Teresa Sue Klein, age 53, of Flatbush New York (USA). Teresa clearly felt “empowered” by her feminist sisters, who have spent the last several weeks publicizing their sordid rape fantasies about a handsome Supreme Court justice. Not wanting to miss out on the attention, Skank-ho Teresa decided to wander down to the grocery and find some unfortunate random man to falsely accuse.

Once in position, this vile wimminz started screaming and cursing, claiming someone had “grabbed [her] ass.” When asked to identify the culprit, skank-ho Teresa fingered a nine-year old little boy.

Here’s The New York Post with more on Teresa-kook’s destructive public meltdown.

(lolled hard at: “paying for two bags of cat litter…”)

When passersby did not pay proper deference to this heroic feminist, she decided to call the police. Amazingly, local police dispatchers corroborate witness reports, all of whom stated that this whore accused a nine-year old little boy of raping her in the supermarket.

When the young brother and his distraught family, who had clearly done nothing whatever to this stupid bitch, attempted to leave, Skank-ho Teresa impersonated a police officer, and told them all that they were under arrest.

If this is the new way of things, then truly, the fun is only just beginning. No man is safe in our feminist paradise, even the little ones…

Down below, someone writes…

By the way, Boxer, I’m sorry not to see your comments on Dalrock these days.

Then someone else writes…

The cognitive dissonance being shown by Dalrock is incredible to behold…..him and his right wing faggots who religiously follow him, moan and bitch about gynocracy, the evil nature of women, the nasty pitfalls of marriage, the gynocentric laws that protect women and destroy men, yet they then have the gall to preach that marriage is the best thing ever, that fornication is so wrong, that good men should get married and lead his wife blah blah blah

I generally don’t go where I’m not wanted; but, there’s another general issue that comment farms are prone to promoting, that I want to talk about.

Smart peeps like Fred Nitzke and Groucho Marx called the phenomenon ressentiment. It’s not resentment, but it’s close. It’s also not a specifically Marxist or Nietzschean term. I think Kierkegaard might have been the first guy to well-define it, but it’s a phenomenon as old as mankind.

Ressentiment is the special form of hatred which motivated Cane Caldo to chase that retired military officer around, like an obsessed wimminz, for years on end, nipping at his heels, until he finally left Dalrock. It’s rooted in a general envy, and Cane Caldo on Dalrock isn’t the only one who regularly displays it. (I only pick on him because he’s particularly mockable). It’s all over those comment sections.

What the Dalrock/Heartiste crowd doesn’t seem to understand is that us normals don’t want to hang out with folks who are stuck in this mindset. It’s incredibly negative. Ressentiment saps the will and weakens the body.

Recently, both Dalrock and Heartiste went suspiciously quiet. For a few hours, I wondered if WordPress was going Full Dorsey, and beginning to silence their controversial free accounts. When it happened, I received about two dozen new comment submissions in the span of a couple of days. I denied almost all of them, because they were bringing their Dalrockesque spew over here. A couple of normals got through (Hi Heidi!), but most of the newbies were losers, and they were consigned to the round file.

If my job entails chasing out all the negative creeps, then I suppose I’ll embrace it. I’d rather have no discussion than bad. More importantly, it’s become my job to cultivate a place where the best people can gather and be smart and funny, rather than to let the place be overrun by mediocre whiners.

In this post code, we hate feminists at least as much as Dalrock and Heartiste do, but we aren’t crying about it. We intend to laugh at our enemies in our spare time, while spending the bulk of our energy building our careers, getting married and/or not getting married, having sex or cultivating a thoughtful celibacy, raising families, building local community, and just becoming more well-rounded and better grounded people. The typical commenters on Dalrock and Heartiste can’t (won’t) do any of these things, because ressentiment is a trap which is all-consuming and all-encompassing.

So, Kanye met the president. Over on Jack Dorsey’s echo chamber, libs and fags are screeching about “decorum.”

Last I checked, Kanye was a natural-born U.S. Citizen. The oval office, therefore, belongs to him. I’m unclear on exactly how it’s indecorous to allow him inside for a chat. Bear in mind that these are the same people who thought it was perfectly cool for Bill Clinton to face-fuck an intern in the same room.

The real issue, as I see it, is the fact that libs have created a frankenstein-type monster out of a lot of disparate special-interest groups. One of the largest is African-Americans. For better and for worse, African-Americans are tremendously disadvantaged by illegal immigration and crappy trade deals. Thus, Frankenstein’s monster is coming apart at the seams.

Me Love You Long Time!

If I’ve been quiet of late, it’s because I decided, quite on a lark, to ditch the single life and tie the knot with my lovely Filipina bride. There we are in the photo.

Just kidding. That guy’s way more alpha than I am, and I couldn’t grow his beard to save my life.

Getting serious, I found this heartwarming tale over on heartiste. All those older fellas who tell us that SE Asia has the best women: this one is for you.

… found in some dumb bastard’s car, after he sold it.

Pretty funny. Probably NSFW.

When the word ‘terrorist’ appears in print, we generally don’t think of the British, and that’s a mistake. The first international terrorist was a British Army Officer named T. E. Lawrence. He’s popularly known as Lawrence of Arabia. While Lawrence used violence in a military application against the Turks of the Ottoman Empire, many of his tactical ideals can easily be adapted to our ends.

When an oppressed people are outnumbered by a much superior force, fighting is useless. Moreover, the hierarchical structures taught in unconventional warfare classes tend toward penetration by the enemy. This is our situation today. We live in a feminist state, and the feminists are our deadly enemies. They want to stamp out our free speech. They want to break up our families. They want our children raped and brainwashed, and they intend to laugh while it happens.

The feminist controls the judicial system. The feminist controls the police. Right wing faggots (you’ll find them in Dalrock’s comment section) who vote Trump and who think that the police are their friends… they’re idiots. The police love nothing more than killing people just like you, and the feminists who sign their paychecks have given them permission to ice you the minute you become uppity. Don’t believe me? Just question them at the door, as they arrive after your skank-ho wife calls them on.

With such overwhelming power at their disposal, it seems like the feminists have already won, and the proper response is merely to prepare to be marched away to the gas chamber. This is where Lawrence of Arabia appears, to tell you that you’re wrong. The system is overwhelmingly powerful, it’s true. The system has nearly all of the automatic weapons, tanks and artillery pieces. The system has unlimited funds. The system has an entire ideological apparatus (called the faggot divorce courts) to separate you from your life’s produce, under color of law. You’re only one man. What can you do?

The same materiel which gives the system its power also gives the system its lag. The feminists are strong but they are slow. You are weak, but you are mobile.

The feminists employ armed men. When foreign antifeminists need to be wiped out, the feminists who kill them are called “the army.” When domestic antifeminists need to be wiped out, the feminists who kill them are called “the police.” These armed feminists have weapons and body armor, but they are also corrupt and shiftless. You are ideologically pure, motivated by a love of your people, high culture, and civilization. They are motivated only so far as their paychecks keep arriving. Moreover, most of them are vulnerable to the same injustices that you intend to resist. Whether the feminist killers admit as much, they are forced to admire you.

Feminists are uncreative. They need leaders, to tell them what to do. If you needed a leader, then that leader will sell you out to save his own ass. You do not need a leader. You have superior intellect, and what Che Guevara called a “leading idea.” The ideals of the patriarchy are your leader. Thousands and thousands of winners, your ancestors, call up through time to inspire you. The words and deeds of great men are recorded in the archives, and these men appear on demand to give you your marching orders. Thousands of little children, yet unborn, count on you to do your part.

T. E. Lawrence lost most of his battles, but the Turks lost the war to his Arab forces, because his goal was to survive, and his strategy was to use all of his inherent weaknesses in an asymmetric contest to his advantage. If you want to prevail in the war, as it is, you will do the same thing.