Breaking News: Wimminz Lies about Rape

In a one-time-only, never to be repeated spectacle, the first wimminz who ever vomited up a filthy, fictitious rape-fantasy about a handsome, powerful man, and told it as though it were true, has admitted she was bullshitting the entire time.

This proves that wimminz never lie about rape.

Bonus funnies in the comments: Wimminz are reminding us that wimminz are the true victims here.

11 thoughts on “Breaking News: Wimminz Lies about Rape

  1. I wonder if someone will ever be able to do an accurate count of how many rape accusations are false, because the only number I hear is that widely-vaunted 2%–which I don’t believe. Kavanaugh’s case is special, of course, because he is a high-profile man and thus subject to many more false accusations.

    In any case, we must go after women who make these false accusations. Right now, there is very little incentive not to lodge an accusation; Blasey-Ford, for instance, has not only not been punished for her smear, but has received nearly a million dollars in donations. I believe I heard of a man who is suing a woman who made false accusations, and good for him, but we need strong public support for the actions of him and others like him.

    And, well, yeah, the primary victims here are those falsely accused–not other women who have actually been raped; nevertheless, I agree with the commenters’ point. “Sexual assault” as a term has been inflated to the point that it’s the linguistic equivalent of Zimbabwean dollars. The fact is, rape and attempted rape really are vile crimes, but by turning essentially any encounter between a man and a woman into a #metoo outcry we are trivializing these experiences.

  2. ‘ Wimminz are reminding us that wimminz are the true victims here.’

    Well of course…anything that happens the woman is always the victim.

    A man falsely accused of rape and his life was turned upside down because of it…nothingburger.

  3. Perhaps victimhood is the reason why this statement makes more sense…

    “Don’t try to understand women. Women understand women and they hate each other.”

  4. Heidi, there’s only been 1 truly in depth report of false rape accusations. That’s by Eugene Kanin and of the women who go to the police and get a full investigation launched around 85% are lying. 50% are definitely lying, as they will admit it. 25% the evidence of their lying is overwhelming, and 10% the evidence is very strong they are lying. So 15% might be telling the truth.

    The 2% number is complete feminist fiction with no basis in reality. Other numbers such as 10% or 12% are misleading as they are based on the percentage of false accusers who are prosecuted.

  5. Heidi, there.s only been 1 truly in depth report of false rape accusations. That.s by Eugene Kanin and of the women who go to the police and get a full investigation launched around 85% are lying. 50% are definitely lying, as they will admit it. 25% the evidence of their lying is overwhelming, and 10% the evidence is very strong they are lying. So 15% might be telling the truth.

    The 2% number is complete feminist fiction with no basis in reality. Other numbers such as 10% or 12% are misleading as they are based on the percentage of false accusers who are prosecuted.

    ^^^ What Jew613 said. ^^^

    That study was circa 1980’s iirc .. so the question becomes .. has it gotten better or has it gotten worse?

    (IMO) Verdict: WORSE

  6. Thanks for the information, Jew613. I looked at a study by Kanin that noted 41% of claims were proven false. To my uneducated eye, it looks well done, but I’d like to see something on a larger scale; the total n of 109 in a midwestern city might limit the generalizability of the findings. In one very interesting section, Kanin noted the incredible diversity of false rape allegations as reported by various law enforcement agencies–from a low of .25% to a high of perhaps 100%. He dryly comments “The extraordinary range of these estimates makes a researcher suspect that inordinate biases are at work.”

  7. There was a military study .. 1980’s iirc .. that had the same / similar results as mentioned.

    I don’t have it on hand.

    My advice is to not believe a womminz unless she has male witnesses that can verify her story. Oh .. that would mean th wimminz would need male escorts to ensure she remain a pure lil snowflake till her day of marriage. Scratch that idea. I’ll just choose to not believe any womminz in that case.

  8. ‘That study was circa 1980.s iirc .. so the question becomes .. has it gotten better or has it gotten worse?’

    Well are hoards of men raping left and right going up or women’s need for attention going up?

    Yeah, easy answer.

  9. Checking out various versions of this source:

    “Every year since 1989, in about 25 percent of the sexual assault cases referred to the FBI where
    results could be obtained (primarily by State and local law enforcement), the primary suspect has been excluded by forensic DNA testing. Specifically, FBI officials report that out of roughly 10,000 sexual assault cases since 1989,
    about 2,000 tests have been inconclusive (usually insufficient high molecular weight DNA to do testing), about 2,000 tests have excluded the primary suspect, and about 6,000 have “matched” or included the primary suspect.”

    This isn’t exactly false accusations, but it is wrongful accusations much higher than single digit percents. The primary rape suspect is often excluded in the course of investigation due to DNA results.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *