“No Rude Comments!”

Cometh now the immoral Christians, to shame sensible men for refusing to play a rigged game.

(CNSNews.com) – Seventy percent of American males between the ages of 20 and 34 are not married, and many live in a state of “perpetual adolescence” with ominous consequences for the nation’s future, says Janice Shaw Crouse, author of “Marriage Matters.”

A Christian CONservative wimminz is bemoaning the scarcity of willing victims for the ongoing scam called “marriage,” imagine my shock!

“Far too many young men have failed to make a normal progression into adult roles of responsibility and self-sufficiency, roles generally associated with marriage and fatherhood,” Crouse, the former executive director of the Beverly LaHaye Institute, wrote in a recent Washington Times oped.

While it is certainly true that some of these men are maladjusted, lazy slackers, the majority are probably represented by the hundreds of boys I’m paid to rub shoulders with daily.

These young brothers are refusing to be enslaved and ripped off. In that regard, they are the absolute opposite of “perpetual adolescents.” They are free-thinking, savvy consumers, who won’t settle for the raw deal which is contemporary American wimminz.

The high percentage of bachelors means bleak prospects for millions of young women who dream about a wedding day that may never come. “It’s very, very depressing,” Crouse told CNSNews.com. “They’re not understanding how important it is for the culture, for society, for the strength of the nation to have strong families.”

Oh, those poor, poor wimminz. They’ve taken thousands of cocks, beginning at the age of thirteen, and now they’re crowning thirty, and finding the paucity of hunky millionaires willing to pledge their lives and fortunes in return for a banged-out, disease-ridden stinkhole very inconvenient.

Won’t any of you brothers be a good white knight for one of these disgusting prostitutes? She deserves to have that dream wedding come true, ten years to the day before she serves you with an order for lifetime alimony.

She pointed out that there’s “no data” to back up the common assertion that a lack of jobs during and after the Great Recession is the primary reason so many young men have been reluctant to tie the knot. “The problem with marriage was long before that,” she pointed out.

That’s correct, bitch. The problem began when our grandmother’s generation started whoring around and sending our grandfathers the bill for their shit behavior. I learned from their misfortune, and from the looks of things, the generations coming up now are harder than I ever dreamt of being.

Read this dumb slag’s opinion here; and, scroll to the bottom of the page to see who is writing this drivel. (Hint: she’s a looker.) Finally, remember boys: Say “no” to the ho’.

Do you suppose these wimminz give their husbands the respect they give the men on the side? Why or why not? Discuss!

Feminist Parasites Keep The Worker from His Labor!

If an administrator decides that my strategy is inconsistent with his, then he will boot me from his site. Thus it is that while I can read Lori Alexander’s blog, I can not post comments to it. Posting comments is a privilege, not a right. Moreover, segregated spaces are vanishingly rare. The presence of men on a sister’s blog may easily destabilize the balance she’s cultivating.

If you decide to visit a blog in the women’s auxiliary, please mind your manners and respect your host’s requests.

Over in Sister Lori’s comment farm, Kate notes:

Lori you would be shocked at how many men do not want a stay at home wife. My mother stayed at home and although I went to college (a gift from my parents, I have no debt) I plan to stop working after I have my first child, and my husband supports this. However in college some of my male friends were appalled. They said their wife would work and that they would expect nothing less.

I think many people miss the underlying motivation for a young man, who wants his wife to work. In most cases, I’ve found that this is due to the social engineering of the divorce-related legislation, which has become progressively more perverse in the last couple of generations.

A young man intuits that when (and it’s when, not if) his wife divorces him, he will lose less if she has an established income. Specifically, the divorce courts will cripple him financially if she is a stay-at-home mother. Her status will entitle her to lifetime alimony and often most of his pension, also. That same young man sees a working wife as less expensive, overall. He intuits this through the experiences of his father, his uncles, and the male relatives of his friends.

So, while a stay-at-home wife would be a much better mother to his children, the striver wife will at least allow for a normal adulthood and retirement. He is voting with his feet, as his survival depends upon it.

Never forget the treachery of #NeverTrump Senator Jeff Flake: Dogfaced Mormon Scumbag, seen here with his brother, war criminal Johnny Mac.

Something from our sister, Lori Alexander…

Feminism has caused women to want to be equal with men. They want to have careers and be away from their homes. Many no longer want to bear nor raise their children so why should men want to marry since they can have their sexual needs fulfilled so easily by the many available women who are choosing not to save themselves for marriage?

Pro-click

Women are also the ones seeking divorce so this makes marriage even more undesirable for most men. I look around me and see few young people marrying and bearing children. Men don’t want to get married and then give half of what they own to a woman who will then divorce them, raise their children away from them, and may even remarry so another man raises their children. Way too many young Christian couples are divorcing after only being married a few years and it’s tragic.

Oh no, she didn’t!

Read the entire article: Lori Alexander: Women are No Longer Marriage Material, at the subversive Transformed Wife blog.

…is kill all the journalists.

Down below, Kentucky Headhunter writes…

The media will be well represented when the time to line the traitors up against the wall.

While the dishonesty of journalists shouldn’t be minimized, there are a number of factors at play in the stories we read.

1. American society is hopelessly topheavy and needlessly complex. Part of the energy of Trump’s realignment is his astute knowledge of system dynamics, and his ability to leverage the potential energy in our unstable society for his benefit. It’s not that journalists lie more under Trump, than they did under Obama. It’s that Obama was too inept to call attention to it.

No disrespect to Obama, by the way. Bush and Clinton were also too stupid to see this golden opportunity. This was amply demonstrated in Hillary’s pandering to a hostile press, in hopes that they’d throw her softballs (they didn’t) as opposed to Trump calling them out, and becoming a people’s hero in the process.

2. There are a number of ever-shifting filters that shape the stories we read, and many of these are applied before the story ever gets delivered to the corporate press. Leakers exaggerate, PR people spin, and often sources will misunderstand what they’re telling a journalist anyway, emphasizing irrelevant points rather than laying out the details of the real story.

Nassim Nicholas Taleb has spent a large amount of time and effort criticizing supposedly “smart” folks (i.e. people in academia, big business, etc.) for knowing facts without ever understanding the machinations that bring them about. This is particularly relevant to the present, dreadful state of the fifth estate.

3. Specific to Trump, and perhaps a corollary to the first point, we have a president who is not only smarter than his critics, he is exceptionally adept at controlling and manipulating these self-important fools in the capitalist media. He has been honing his skills in this regard since the 1980s, when he was a favored guest of daytime and nighttime talk shows. The fact that he produced a television series qualifies him, by any objective standard, for a doctorate in media studies.

Does he care when the media puts out coordinated hit pieces on him? It doesn’t appear so. A glorified blogger from the NYT or WaPo is due to make his thirteenth straight front-page declaration that Trump is finished, he’ll be indicted this week, and all that. The handful of credulous fools (all wimminz and male feminists) who take such stuff seriously have set themselves up to have their spirits crushed again, and it is as likely as not that Trump leaked the coming impeachment to the idiots himself. He seems to use the news cycle to fan the flames of some irrelevant nonsense in his right hand, while he’s strangling his enemies with his left, all out of sight. About half the time he wants the story to upset his base, so that he can use that energy to push through necessary legislation that the CONservative capitalist republicans of the GOP would never touch otherwise.

I used to think that Trump was Gerald Ford reborn. A savvy liberal republican of the Rockefeller mold. Now I see him as a 21st century incarnation of either Lenin or Andrew Jackson. He’s winning, for you and for me, and every rich faggot and establishment hack who doesn’t want to get burned out of his mcmansion had better go along.

The G.O.P. is dead. Good riddance.

A running theme on this blog is journalistic malfeasance. While no amount of exegesis will decipher the nonsensical output of the establishment press, I find it fun to travel backward through time, and attempt to make sense of the present through the lens of yesterday’s inhuman screeching.

Nearly sixteen months ago, Anne Applebaum at The Washington Post wrote:

It was a very strange choice for a first trip abroad. The past four American presidents, two Republicans and two Democrats, made their first trips to either Mexico and Canada, countries that are close trading partners, close allies, compatible democracies and of course neighbors. Trump chose, instead, to make his first presidential visit to an oligarchic kleptocracy which forces women to hide their faces and forbids them to travel without a male guardian’s permission.

 

It was a very strange place to speak out against Islamist extremism. Although Saudi Arabia is afraid of some forms of Islamist extremism, it supports others. Saudi Arabia sponsors extremist Wahabi mosques and imams all over the world; Osama bin Laden was a Saudi citizen, as were 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers.

 

The sword dance. Every American president has met with his Saudi counterparts, and of course the stability of Saudi Arabia, as well as its oil, is an important U.S. security concern. But until now American presidents made it clear that, while we have to deal with Saudi leaders, we don’t endorse their culture. Trump, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and others in the delegation did exactly that, by participating in this sinister all-male dance.

President Trump’s first foreign trip was to Saudi Arabia. This is apparently unusual, and Ms. Applebaum would like to blow it into a felony. In fact, it was a monumental change in American foreign policy.

If there is anything about the president’s first trip that is especially interesting, in that it has not been extensively written about. As I wasn’t there, I can only speculate as to the nature of Trump’s conversation with the Saudis, but in hindsight, I think a plausible reconstruction is possible.

From Bayoumy, Landay, et. al. at Reuters:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Trump administration is quietly pushing ahead with a bid to create a new security and political alliance with six Gulf Arab states, Egypt and Jordan, in part to counter Iran’s expansion in the region, according to U.S. and Arab officials.

President Trump’s first mission abroad was laying the groundwork for a global reshuffling. He continues to make good on his promise to keep American boys from bleeding and dying for big oil companies. I believe his first foreign trip was delivering the message, from the American people, that the jig is up. The Saudis will no longer be able to order us around.

One will recall that it was about this time that a dozen cruise missiles slammed into various targets in Syria. Whether or not that was meant as a tangible warning to the oil sheiks, it probably served the purpose.

People may well bleed and die for transnational capital, but it won’t be American boys. If the Arabs want to bog themselves down in fratricidal wars, they’re welcome to do it, and President Trump will sell all sides American-made weapons to get the job done.

we make the best weapons… really terrific

We won’t be subsidizing people who hate us any longer, though we will take our rightful places as the global purveyor of armaments.

Another recent story has the liberal press wailing, and it’s about the same general part of the world.

From Edward Wong at the New York Times:

WASHINGTON — The United States government has decided to stop all funding it gives to a United Nations agency that provides assistance to millions of Palestinian refugees, ending a decades-long policy of supporting it, according to a former senior United States aid official.

 

The move was pushed hardest by Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and top adviser on the Middle East, as part of a plan to compel Palestinian politicians to drop demands for many of those refugees to return to what they call their homeland, said the former official, R. David Harden, who worked at the United States Agency for International Development until April.

The propagandists are understating the case quite considerably. President Trump caused the Palestinian Authority to go broke, almost overnight. Suddenly, we aren’t providing 90 percent of the budget to a government that hates America, and celebrates when her people are slaughtered.

Naturally, all the usual whiners are hand-wringing

From Isabel Kershner in New York Times:

“This administration is dismantling decades of U.S. vision and engagement in Palestine,” Husam Zomlot, the head of the Palestine Liberation Organization’s general delegation to the United States, said in a statement.

Whatever those decades of “vision” and “engagement” have returned to the American people, who subsidized them, isn’t clear.

The Trump presidency has reoriented the politics of heartland America (whites and most blacks) toward visions of trade and immigration, and away from the old CONservative talking points around tax-cuts for wealthy scumbags and cutting budgets to screw over everyday workers. He has also separated a huge number of that same population from the typical republican establishment. Whether or not the Trump presidency lasts a second term, he has succeeded in making “America First” a viable slogan, for the first time in over a century. It started in Saudi Arabia.

Last week, in the early morning hours (of Wednesday, 28 August 2018), a Houston area homeowner was awakened by frantic pounding on his front door. When he answered, finding no one in sight, he probably assumed it was assholes, doing what assholes will. (Boxer was exactly such an asshole, ’round about age 13.)

Thinking he’d get a bit of payback by identifying the culprits and waking their parents, he immediately scrolled through surveillance video of the door-ditcher. What he saw was considerably more concerning than teenage pranksters.

The video, which has now gone viral on social media, depicts a strange wimminz, wearing only a t-shirt, who can be seen running to the poor guy’s door, knocking and ringing, then looking around, frightened, before she quickly scoots back into the darkness. Both wrists trail chains and shackles, and she doesn’t appear to have any pants on.

I’ll let the “fair and balanced” conservative faggot media take the story from here:

Authorities in Texas said Wednesday that they have identified the woman whose appearance in a bizarre video led to speculation about who she was and what she may have been running from.

 

Officials launched a search for the woman after she was videoed ringing a stranger’s doorbell early Friday in a Sunrise Ranch subdivision north of Houston. The woman, clad in only a T-shirt, ran away before the homeowner could answer the door.

 

The sheriff’s office released the video on social media earlier this week, prompting a flood of tips suggesting the woman was a missing person from as far away as Canada.

 

However, on Wednesday, Sheriff’s Lt. Scott Spencer said the 32-year-old woman was originally from the Dallas area and had not been reported missing at any point. Spencer added that the woman’s name would not be made public because she was a victim of domestic violence.

mmmm… yesss… domestic violence. Some man must be at fault.

A day later, some new developments. Here’s Faux News, again with the fair, balanced, totally not pro-feminist interpretation of events:

A woman, who was seen in surveillance video ringing doorbells in Texas, told police she was a victim of sexual assault and had broken free from bondage handcuffs used to restrain her.

 

Officials launched a search for the woman earlier this week after she was captured on video ringing doorbells in the Sunrise Ranch, a Montgomery subdivision located 50 miles north of Houston.

 

The woman, clad in only a T-shirt and with restraints hanging from her wrists, left before the homeowner could answer the door.

 

On Wednesday, police announced they found the woman. Her boyfriend, Dennis Ray Collins, 49, was found dead of a self-inflicted gunshot wound at his home in the same subdivision.

 

The Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office released more details about the case Thursday.

Of course, it’s “a boyfriend” who did this. Men do this shit all the time, and no one should trust her “boyfriend.”

“The female described the restraints seen on the previously released video as restraints commonly used in private intimate encounters,” Lt. Scott Spencer told reporters.

 

It was not immediately clear if she was held against her will.

Well, well. Isn’t this interesting. We had to dig through dozens of stories, pages and pages long, to get to the real truth of the matter, buried on the last page.

As an aside, I can’t imagine why so many people hate journalists, either.

Spencer said she was able to “break free” from the restraints and flee the home. The woman rang the doorbells of two neighbors that night. When no one answered, she returned back to Collins’ home. She then got a car and drove to the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

I wonder if she told her “family” where she’d been in the interim? I’m guessing no.

“Due to the allegations made by the female of sexual assault we will not be naming the victim in this case,” he continued.

 

The woman was described as a 32-year-old female from the Dallas area and is safe with her family.

Now we’re getting the picture, no thanks to the dishonest feminist media.

For those of you brothers who are slow on the uptake, here is the best possible interpretation I can come up with…

1. Wimminz leaves her “family” (I’m guessing a husband) in the Great Plains, and drives four hours south, to the tropics, to have kinky sex with a man she hardly knew.

2. After wimminz arrives and goes to her “boyfriend” house (who she probably had never met before,) she gets chained up, and lets him do all manner of nasty shit to her.

3. So-called “boyfriend” (in-reality, he’s just an anonymous hookup) is likely cheating on his own wife with this skank. He feels guilty, probably for this reason, and pens a suicide note, then eats a bullet, because he knows he’s just fucked over his wife and kids.

4. OOPS! The swinging dick forgot to unlock the handcuffs. While the twisted bitch probably got off on seeing him kill himself, the wife will be home in a few hours. Bitch frantically breaks free, busts a window, and leaves, pretending she is being followed and chased.

Now, I mentioned that this is the best possible interpretation. I don’t think it’s very likely, however. A more probable interpretation involves a suicide pact that she backed out of, or, possibly, her murdering this guy, and concocting a story (thanks to the nice folks who penned VAWA) which will immunize her from prosecution for the mayhem she caused.

No matter what the truth really is, the poor schlub she’s now back with really ought to head on down to the divorce courts, and get those papers filed.